Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz, while Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz is around 6% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 15% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1741 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $398.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | LGA2011 | FCLGA1150 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.6 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 130W | 45W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $8.21 | |
Other | Intel HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel Processors | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q1 2012 | |
# of Samples | 1617 | 124 | |
CPU Value | 83.5 | 15.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1757(-14.9%) | 2066(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5846(-5.9%) | 6215(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 5,846 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz | 6,215 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 83.5 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz | 15.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | 1,757 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz | 2,066 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 @ 3.60GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 @ 2.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 130W | 45W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |