Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz is newer than Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz also around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz uses around 17% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 619 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz | ×Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $65.1 - BUY | $37 - BUY | |
Socket Type | LGA1155 | FCLGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 65W | 55W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $10.04 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2012 | Q4 2012 | |
# of Samples | 14 | 605 | |
CPU Value | 21.3 | 41.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1289(-6.7%) | 1381(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1388(-9.3%) | 1530(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz | 1,388 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 1,530 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz | 21.3 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 41.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz | 1,289 | |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 1,381 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G555 @ 2.70GHz | Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 55W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |