Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD PRO A6-9500E is newer than Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz also around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 8% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 623 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | ×AMD PRO A6-9500E | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1155 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 55W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $10.04 | $6.39 | |
Other | R5, 6 COMPUTE CORES 2C+4G | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2012 | Q1 2017 | |
# of Samples | 606 | 17 | |
CPU Value | 22.2 | 22.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1382(-7.9%) | 1501(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1532(-9.3%) | 1689(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 1,532 | |
AMD PRO A6-9500E | 1,689 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 22.2 | |
AMD PRO A6-9500E | 22.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | 1,382 | |
AMD PRO A6-9500E | 1,501 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz | AMD PRO A6-9500E | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 55W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |