Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz is newer than VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz, while VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz is around 6% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz is around 39% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 34 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | ×Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | BGA400 | FCBGA1170 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.2 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 448KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 7.5W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $1.28 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q4 2013 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 31 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 2.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 298(-38.9%) | 4873(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 400(0.0%) | 377(-5.6%) |
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | 400 | |
Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | 377 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | NA | |
Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | 2.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | 298 | |
Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | 487 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 7.5W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |