Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core is newer than Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz, while Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz is around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 14% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core uses around 17% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 439 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core | ×Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FM2 | FCLGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 96KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 65W | 55W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $10.04 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q1 2013 | |
# of Samples | 52 | 387 | |
CPU Value | 13.9 | 32.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1252(-13.9%) | 1454(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1324(-15.8%) | 1571(0.0%) |
AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core | 1,324 | |
Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | 1,571 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core | 13.9 | |
Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | 32.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core | 1,252 | |
Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | 1,454 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Athlon X2 340 Dual Core | Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 55W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |