Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz also around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz is around 37% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1160 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$65 - BUY
![]() |
$60 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA 2011 | FCLGA2011 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.5 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
TDP | 95W | 130W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $23.73 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2014 | Q3 2013 | |
# of Samples | 45 | 1115 | |
CPU Value | 116.8 | 109.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1270(-37.0%) | 2015(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 7590(0.0%) | 6546(-13.8%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz | 7,590 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | 6,546 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz | 116.8 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | 109.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz | 1,270 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | 2,015 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 @ 2.00GHz | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 @ 3.70GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 95W | 130W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |