Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz is newer than AMD Athlon 64 2000+ also around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 35% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Athlon 64 2000+ uses around 46% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 12 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz | |
2: AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | |
×Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz | ×AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1170 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 1.5 GHz | 1.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 1 (Threads: 1) | 1 (Threads: 1) | |
Cache | L1: 448KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, | |
TDP | 5W | 8W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $0.91 | $1.46 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2014 | Q4 2013 | |
# of Samples | 10 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 1.4 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2663(0.0%) | 1733(-34.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 184(0.0%) | 154(-16.2%) |
Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz | 184 | |
AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | 154 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz | 1.4 | |
AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz | 266 | |
AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | 173 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom E3815 @ 1.46GHz | AMD Athlon 64 2000+ | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 5W | 8W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |