Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz also around 41% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 28% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F32 uses around 40% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 476 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F32 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $122.02 - BUY | $199.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.1 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 120W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $21.90 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2014 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 469 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 111.0 | 115.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1687(-28.1%) | 2347(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 13545(-41.5%) | 23142(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 13,545 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 111.0 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz | 1,687 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 120W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |