Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 3365 also around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 30% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Opteron 3365 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 183 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD Opteron 3365 | ×Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | AM3+ | LGA2011-v3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.3 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (in 4 physical modules) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 10MB | |
TDP | 65W | 140W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $25.55 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2014 | Q1 2015 | |
# of Samples | 32 | 151 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 346.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1133(-30.0%) | 1619(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4083(-8.4%) | 4459(0.0%) |
AMD Opteron 3365 | 4,083 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | 4,459 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 3365 | NA | |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | 346.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 3365 | 1,133 | |
Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | 1,619 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Opteron 3365 | Intel Xeon E5-1603 v3 @ 2.80GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 140W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |