Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz is newer than AMD Opteron 3365 is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD Opteron 3365 uses around 36% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 52 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD Opteron 3365 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1155 | AM3+ | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.3 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 8 (in 4 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | L1: 640KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 45W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | $11.86 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2015 | Q4 2014 | |
# of Samples | 20 | 32 | |
CPU Value | 14.5 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1436(0.0%) | 1133(-21.1%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3912(-4.2%) | 4083(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz | 3,912 | |
AMD Opteron 3365 | 4,083 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz | 14.5 | |
AMD Opteron 3365 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz | 1,436 | |
AMD Opteron 3365 | 1,133 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E3-1265L @ 2.40GHz | AMD Opteron 3365 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 45W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |