Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7402 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 31% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7402 uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 17 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7402 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7402 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $598.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.9 GHz | Up to 3.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,152KB, L2: 4.5MB, L3: 45MB | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 135W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2015 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 12 | |
CPU Value | 3.2 | 76.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1474(-30.8%) | 2129(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 17430(-62.1%) | 46012(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | 17,430 | |
AMD EPYC 7402 | 46,012 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | 3.2 | |
AMD EPYC 7402 | 76.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | 1,474 | |
AMD EPYC 7402 | 2,129 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-4669 v3 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 7402 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 135W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.27 | 0.36 |
Running cost per day | $0.068 | $0.090 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 98.6 | 131.4 |
Running cost per year | $24.64 | $32.85 |