Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD A10-7860K is newer than Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz also around 24% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 14% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz uses around 38% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2242 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD A10-7860K | ×Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FM2+ | LGA775 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.6 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (in 2 physical modules) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 448KB, L2: 8.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
TDP | 65W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $17.34 | |
Other | Radeon R7, 12 Compute Cores 4C+8G | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2016 | Q4 2008 | |
# of Samples | 462 | 1780 | |
CPU Value | 62.0 | 45.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1486(0.0%) | 1283(-13.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3276(0.0%) | 2475(-24.4%) |
AMD A10-7860K | 3,276 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 2,475 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A10-7860K | 62.0 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 45.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A10-7860K | 1,486 | |
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | 1,283 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A10-7860K | Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 @ 3.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 65W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |