Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 25% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 333 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F32 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$109 - BUY
![]() |
$199.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.1 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 85W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $15.51 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2016 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 326 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 105.7 | 115.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1766(-24.7%) | 2347(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 11523(-50.2%) | 23142(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 11,523 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 105.7 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz | 1,766 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 85W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.17 | 0.36 |
Running cost per day | $0.043 | $0.090 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 62.1 | 131.4 |
Running cost per year | $15.51 | $32.85 |