Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT is newer than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X also around 15% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 17% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2857 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | ×AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$375 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | sTR4 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 180W | 105W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $32.85 | $19.16 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 1493 | 1364 | |
CPU Value | 44.5 | 86.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2278(-16.9%) | 2742(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 27676(-15.1%) | 32605(0.0%) |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 27,676 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | 32,605 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 44.5 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | 86.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 2,278 | |
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | 2,742 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 180W | 105W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |