Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD A6-9230 is newer than Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz, while Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz is around 17% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 23% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD A6-9230 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 392 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD A6-9230 | |
2: Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | |
×AMD A6-9230 | ×Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | FCLGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 2.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | |
TDP | 15W | 55W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | $10.04 | |
Other | RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q1 2013 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 387 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 32.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1124(-22.7%) | 1454(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1303(-17.1%) | 1571(0.0%) |
AMD A6-9230 | 1,303 | |
Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | 1,571 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A6-9230 | NA | |
Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | 32.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A6-9230 | 1,124 | |
Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | 1,454 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD A6-9230 | Intel Celeron G1620 @ 2.70GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 15W | 55W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.03 | 0.11 |
Running cost per day | $0.007 | $0.028 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 10.9 | 40.1 |
Running cost per year | $2.74 | $10.04 |