Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7662 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing but the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. However, AMD EPYC 7662 uses around 40% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 12 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7662 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1179.91 - BUY
![]() |
$4379.54 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 64 (Threads: 128) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 33MB | L1: 4,096KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 150W | 225W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $41.06 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2017 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 4 | 8 | |
CPU Value | 24.4 | 16.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2077(-1.2%) | 2102(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 28825(-60.1%) | 72298(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 28,825 | |
AMD EPYC 7662 | 72,298 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 24.4 | |
AMD EPYC 7662 | 16.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | 2,077 | |
AMD EPYC 7662 | 2,102 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8160 @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 7662 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 225W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |