Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F72 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6154 @ 3.00GHz also around 47% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F72 uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 27 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6154 @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F72 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$622.37 - BUY
![]() |
$939.9 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 192MB | |
TDP | 200W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $36.50 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2017 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 18 | 9 | |
CPU Value | 44.5 | 56.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2203(-7.4%) | 2379(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 27717(-47.4%) | 52662(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 @ 3.00GHz | 27,717 | |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | 52,662 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 @ 3.00GHz | 44.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | 56.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 @ 3.00GHz | 2,203 | |
AMD EPYC 7F72 | 2,379 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6154 @ 3.00GHz | AMD EPYC 7F72 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 200W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |