Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7401P, while AMD EPYC 7401P is around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7401P uses around 21% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 74 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7401P | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7401P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$215.6 - BUY
![]() |
$2499.99 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | L1: 2,304KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 125W | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2017 | Q4 2017 | |
# of Samples | 45 | 29 | |
CPU Value | 111.4 | 11.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2049(0.0%) | 1680(-18.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24018(-13.7%) | 27836(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz | 24,018 | |
AMD EPYC 7401P | 27,836 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz | 111.4 | |
AMD EPYC 7401P | 11.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz | 2,049 | |
AMD EPYC 7401P | 1,680 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6138 @ 2.00GHz | AMD EPYC 7401P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.25 | 0.31 |
Running cost per day | $0.063 | $0.077 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 91.3 | 113.2 |
Running cost per year | $22.81 | $28.29 |