Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz is newer than AMD A10-5750M APU, while AMD A10-5750M APU is around 16% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1110 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | |
2: AMD A10-5750M APU | |
×Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD A10-5750M APU | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $78.02 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1356 | FS1r2 | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 4 (in 4 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 2MB | L1: 320KB, L2: 8.0MB, | |
TDP | 15W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | $6.39 | |
Other | Intel HD Graphics 610 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2017 | Q2 2013 | |
# of Samples | 44 | 1066 | |
CPU Value | 16.2 | 26.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1339(0.0%) | 1164(-13.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1732(-15.5%) | 2051(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 1,732 | |
AMD A10-5750M APU | 2,051 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 16.2 | |
AMD A10-5750M APU | 26.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | 1,339 | |
AMD A10-5750M APU | 1,164 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron 3965U @ 2.20GHz | AMD A10-5750M APU | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 15W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.03 | 0.07 |
Running cost per day | $0.007 | $0.018 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 10.9 | 25.6 |
Running cost per year | $2.74 | $6.39 |