Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7501, while AMD EPYC 7501 is around 14% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7501 uses around 38% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 2 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 7501 | |
2: Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 7501 | ×Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | Search Online | |
Socket Type | SP3 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 32 (Threads: 64) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 3,072KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 64MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 22MB | |
TDP | 155W | 105W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $28.29 | $19.16 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2017 | Q2 2019 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 18.8 | 15.9 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1925(-15.7%) | 2282(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24925(0.0%) | 21433(-14.0%) |
AMD EPYC 7501 | 24,925 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz | 21,433 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7501 | 18.8 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz | 15.9 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7501 | 1,925 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz | 2,282 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7501 | Intel Xeon Gold 5218T @ 2.10GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 155W | 105W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.31 | 0.21 |
Running cost per day | $0.077 | $0.052 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 113.2 | 76.6 |
Running cost per year | $28.29 | $19.16 |