Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9354 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz also around 45% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9354 uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9354 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $4255.86 - BUY | $3298.82 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 1,792KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 2,048MB | |
TDP | 205W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q3 2023 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 5 | |
CPU Value | 9.0 | 21.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2142(-12.5%) | 2449(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 38259(-45.2%) | 69825(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 38,259 | |
AMD EPYC 9354 | 69,825 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 9.0 | |
AMD EPYC 9354 | 21.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 2,142 | |
AMD EPYC 9354 | 2,449 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 9354 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |