Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7551, while AMD EPYC 7551 is around 24% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7551 uses around 36% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 19 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7551 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7551 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$152.03 - BUY
![]() |
$126.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.7 GHz | Up to 3.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 19MB | L1: 3,072KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 125W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q3 2017 | |
# of Samples | 8 | 11 | |
CPU Value | 130.3 | 204.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2143(0.0%) | 1766(-17.6%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 19811(-23.7%) | 25960(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | 19,811 | |
AMD EPYC 7551 | 25,960 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | 130.3 | |
AMD EPYC 7551 | 204.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | 2,143 | |
AMD EPYC 7551 | 1,766 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6126 @ 2.60GHz | AMD EPYC 7551 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.25 | 0.36 |
Running cost per day | $0.063 | $0.090 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 91.3 | 131.4 |
Running cost per year | $22.81 | $32.85 |