Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD A9-9425 is newer than Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz also around 6% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 22% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1353 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | ×AMD A9-9425 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1090 | BGA (FT4) | |
CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 1.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 112KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
TDP | 6W | 15W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.10 | $2.74 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G | |
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2018 | Q2 2018 | |
# of Samples | 914 | 439 | |
CPU Value | 13.3 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1037(-22.0%) | 1329(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1428(-6.4%) | 1525(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 1,428 | |
AMD A9-9425 | 1,525 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 13.3 | |
AMD A9-9425 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 1,037 | |
AMD A9-9425 | 1,329 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | AMD A9-9425 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 6W | 15W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |