Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7301 and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 47% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz uses around 28% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 70 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 7301 | |
2: Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 7301 | ×Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1490 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.7 GHz | Up to 4.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 64MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 22MB | |
TDP | 155W | 205W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $28.29 | $37.41 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2019 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 68 | |
CPU Value | 10.1 | 11.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1363(-47.4%) | 2591(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 14991(-51.6%) | 30999(0.0%) |
AMD EPYC 7301 | 14,991 | |
Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz | 30,999 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7301 | 10.1 | |
Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz | 11.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7301 | 1,363 | |
Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz | 2,591 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7301 | Intel Xeon W-3245 @ 3.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 155W | 205W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.31 | 0.41 |
Running cost per day | $0.077 | $0.102 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 113.2 | 149.6 |
Running cost per year | $28.29 | $37.41 |