Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7402P, while AMD EPYC 7402P is around 7% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz is around 25% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz uses around 13% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 66 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7402P | |
×Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7402P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$888.45 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.4 GHz | Up to 3.4 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,792KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 205W | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2020 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 29 | 37 | |
CPU Value | 5.4 | 49.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2677(0.0%) | 2014(-24.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 40465(-7.4%) | 43684(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | 40,465 | |
AMD EPYC 7402P | 43,684 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | 5.4 | |
AMD EPYC 7402P | 49.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | 2,677 | |
AMD EPYC 7402P | 2,014 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275M @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 7402P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.41 | 0.36 |
Running cost per day | $0.102 | $0.090 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 149.6 | 131.4 |
Running cost per year | $37.41 | $32.85 |