Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz is newer than Intel Core i5-9400H @ 2.50GHz, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz is around 5% faster in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). The CPUs selected in this comparison belong in different CPU Classes: Desktop, Laptop. Consider, selecting CPUs from simliar CPU Class for more apt comparison.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3617 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | ×Intel Core i5-9400H @ 2.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1440 | FCBGA1440 | |
CPU Class | Desktop, Laptop | Laptop | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.5 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 45W | 45W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.21 | $8.21 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2020 | Q3 2019 | |
# of Samples | 3395 | 222 | |
CPU Value | 33.2 | 32.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2540(0.0%) | 2406(-5.3%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 8302(0.0%) | 8016(-3.4%) |
Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | 8,302 | |
Intel Core i5-9400H @ 2.50GHz | 8,016 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | 33.2 | |
Intel Core i5-9400H @ 2.50GHz | 32.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | 2,540 | |
Intel Core i5-9400H @ 2.50GHz | 2,406 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i5-10300H @ 2.50GHz | Intel Core i5-9400H @ 2.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 45W | 45W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |