Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9374F is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 2.70GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 34% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9374F uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 17 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 2.70GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9374F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $2286.34 - BUY | Search Online | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 32.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 205W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2020 | Q1 2023 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 14.3 | 23.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2029(-34.1%) | 3077(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 32781(-59.2%) | 80400(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 2.70GHz | 32,781 | |
AMD EPYC 9374F | 80,400 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 2.70GHz | 14.3 | |
AMD EPYC 9374F | 23.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 2.70GHz | 2,029 | |
AMD EPYC 9374F | 3,077 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 2.70GHz | AMD EPYC 9374F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |