Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz is newer than Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz, while Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz is around 10% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz uses around 28% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3362 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz | ×Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $525 - BUY | $300.15 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA2066 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.3 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 20MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 19MB | |
TDP | 125W | 165W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $30.11 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q4 2018 | |
# of Samples | 3250 | 112 | |
CPU Value | 43.2 | 83.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3125(0.0%) | 2638(-15.6%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 22695(-9.8%) | 25147(0.0%) |
Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz | 22,695 | |
Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz | 25,147 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz | 43.2 | |
Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz | 83.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz | 3,125 | |
Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz | 2,638 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i9-10900K @ 3.70GHz | Intel Core i9-9920X @ 3.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 165W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |