Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz is newer than Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz, while Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz is around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7053 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | ×Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | $239 - BUY | $207.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | FCLGA1200 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 5.1 GHz | Up to 4.8 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 16MB | |
TDP | 125W | 65W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $11.86 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 5381 | 1672 | |
CPU Value | 78.3 | 78.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 3048(0.0%) | 2875(-5.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 18722(0.0%) | 16328(-12.8%) |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | 18,722 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 16,328 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | 78.3 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 78.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | 3,048 | |
Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | 2,875 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz | Intel Core i7-10700F @ 2.90GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 65W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |