Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F52 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6240R @ 2.40GHz also around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 8% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F52 uses around 37% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 17 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 7F52 | ×Intel Xeon Gold 6240R @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$1449.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA3647 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
TDP | 240W | 165W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $43.80 | $30.11 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 15 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 21.8 | 23.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2507(0.0%) | 2312(-7.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 41322(0.0%) | 33353(-19.3%) |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6240R @ 2.40GHz | 33,353 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.8 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6240R @ 2.40GHz | 23.0 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
Intel Xeon Gold 6240R @ 2.40GHz | 2,312 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | Intel Xeon Gold 6240R @ 2.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 240W | 165W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |