Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F32 is newer than Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz also around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz is around 24% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 39 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
2: Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 7F32 | ×Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$199.95 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA1200 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.7 GHz | 3.2 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 5.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | |
TDP | 180W | 80W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $32.85 | $14.60 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q3 2020 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 32 | |
CPU Value | 115.7 | 34.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2347(-23.9%) | 3083(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 23142(0.0%) | 20073(-13.3%) |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz | 20,073 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz | 34.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz | 3,083 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | Intel Xeon W-1290 @ 3.20GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 180W | 80W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.36 | 0.16 |
Running cost per day | $0.090 | $0.040 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 131.4 | 58.4 |
Running cost per year | $32.85 | $14.60 |