Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9384X is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz also around 42% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 31% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9384X uses around 44% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 4 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 9384X | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9384X | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$2598.95 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 64KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 39MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 205W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q4 2024 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 3 | |
CPU Value | 15.5 | 12.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2080(-31.0%) | 3015(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 40252(-42.2%) | 69665(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | 40,252 | |
AMD EPYC 9384X | 69,665 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | 15.5 | |
AMD EPYC 9384X | 12.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | 2,080 | |
AMD EPYC 9384X | 3,015 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6258R @ 2.70GHz | AMD EPYC 9384X | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.41 | 0.64 |
Running cost per day | $0.102 | $0.160 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 149.6 | 233.6 |
Running cost per year | $37.41 | $58.40 |