Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7F52, while AMD EPYC 7F52 is around 32% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 16 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.8 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.5 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 99MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 24.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2700(0.0%) | 2507(-7.1%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 28147(-31.9%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | 28,147 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | NA | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 24.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | 2,700 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |