Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7F32 also around 18% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 8 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F32 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price | Search Online | $199.95 - BUY | |
Socket Type | NA2 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.8 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.5 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 99MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 180W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $32.85 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q4 2020 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 115.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2700(0.0%) | 2347(-13.1%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 28147(0.0%) | 23142(-17.8%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | 28,147 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 23,142 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | NA | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 115.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | 2,700 | |
AMD EPYC 7F32 | 2,347 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8252C @ 3.80GHz | AMD EPYC 7F32 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 180W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |