iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB

The Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB is newer than Samsung Exynos 9810, while Samsung Exynos 9810 is around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 828 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.

  • The first section will show basic information for each CPU selected.
  • The additional graphs shows the CPU Mark and Single Thread values of each CPU selected.
  • An accompany graph, if price data is available, will shows the value for money, in terms of the CPU Mark/Thread Rating per dollar.
  • The last section will show approximate yearly running costs for the CPUs.

×Samsung Exynos 9810×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB+ ADD
Price Search Online Search Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
CacheNA2NA2
TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
Other
First Seen on ChartQ1 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples619209
CPU Value0.00.0
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)1303(-18.0%)1590(0.0%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)3771(0.0%)3475(-7.8%)
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 27th of December 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Exynos 9810
3,771
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB
3,475
PassMark Software © 2008-2024
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 27th of December 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Exynos 9810
1,303
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB
1,590
PassMark Software © 2008-2024
Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per day Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)1 Power cost, $ per kWh2
8
25
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc ATOLL-AB
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.