Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9124 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz also around 43% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 17% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9124 uses around 46% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 31 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9124 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$790.41 - BUY
![]() |
$1230.63 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.1 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 20 (Threads: 40) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 28MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 64MB | |
TDP | 125W | 200W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $22.81 | $36.50 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 24 | |
CPU Value | 31.3 | 35.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2234(-16.9%) | 2690(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24742(-43.4%) | 43681(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 24,742 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 43,681 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 31.3 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 35.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | 2,234 | |
AMD EPYC 9124 | 2,690 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5218R @ 2.10GHz | AMD EPYC 9124 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 125W | 200W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |