Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7F52, while AMD EPYC 7F52 is around 34% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7F52 uses around 46% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 34 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1218.18 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 24) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 960KB, L2: 15.0MB, L3: 18MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 150W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $27.38 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 19 | 15 | |
CPU Value | 22.5 | 21.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2366(-5.6%) | 2507(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 27448(-33.6%) | 41322(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz | 27,448 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,322 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz | 22.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz | 2,366 | |
AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,507 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5317 @ 3.00GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 150W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.30 | 0.48 |
Running cost per day | $0.075 | $0.120 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 109.5 | 175.2 |
Running cost per year | $27.38 | $43.80 |