Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Hisilicon Kirin 990, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Hisilicon Kirin 990 is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 615 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | ×Hisilicon Kirin 990 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1338 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 2.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.9 GHz | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 10W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $1.83 | NA | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics | Mali-G76 MP16 | |
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q1 2021 | |
# of Samples | 565 | 50 | |
CPU Value | 13.5 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1505(-9.2%) | 1658(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4037(0.0%) | 3965(-1.8%) |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 4,037 | |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | 3,965 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 13.5 | |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | 1,505 | |
Hisilicon Kirin 990 | 1,658 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz | Hisilicon Kirin 990 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 10W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |