Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7313 is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz also around 15% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 16% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz uses around 18% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 23 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7313 | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7313 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$911.5 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.6 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 26 (Threads: 52) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 185W | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $33.76 | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2021 | Q3 2021 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 22 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 42.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2019(-15.9%) | 2402(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 32835(-15.0%) | 38644(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz | 32,835 | |
AMD EPYC 7313 | 38,644 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz | NA | |
AMD EPYC 7313 | 42.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz | 2,019 | |
AMD EPYC 7313 | 2,402 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6278C @ 2.60GHz | AMD EPYC 7313 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 185W | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.37 | 0.31 |
Running cost per day | $0.092 | $0.077 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 135.1 | 113.2 |
Running cost per year | $33.76 | $28.29 |