Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7232P also around 8% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 27% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 7232P uses around 13% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 13 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7232P | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$575 - BUY
![]() |
$429.26 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 10.0MB, L3: 12MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 105W | 120W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $19.16 | $21.90 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q2 2020 | |
# of Samples | 6 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 33.5 | 41.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2435(0.0%) | 1767(-27.4%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 19237(0.0%) | 17731(-7.8%) |
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | 19,237 | |
AMD EPYC 7232P | 17,731 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | 33.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7232P | 41.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | 2,435 | |
AMD EPYC 7232P | 1,767 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | AMD EPYC 7232P | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 105W | 120W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |