Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz is newer than AMD Athlon 3000G, while AMD Athlon 3000G is around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 24% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 920 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz | |
2: AMD Athlon 3000G | |
×Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz | ×AMD Athlon 3000G | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$65.27 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1338 | AM4 | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 2.9 GHz | Not Supported | |
# of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 4) | 2 (Threads: 4) | |
Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 4MB | L1: 192KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 4MB | |
TDP | 15W | 35W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $2.74 | $6.39 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics | with Radeon Vega 3 Graphics | |
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q4 2019 | |
# of Samples | 372 | 548 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 68.3 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1501(-23.8%) | 1969(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4059(-8.9%) | 4458(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz | 4,059 | |
AMD Athlon 3000G | 4,458 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz | NA | |
AMD Athlon 3000G | 68.3 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz | 1,501 | |
AMD Athlon 3000G | 1,969 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron N5095 @ 2.00GHz | AMD Athlon 3000G | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 15W | 35W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.03 | 0.07 |
Running cost per day | $0.007 | $0.018 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 10.9 | 25.6 |
Running cost per year | $2.74 | $6.39 |