Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9474F is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 2.30GHz also around 41% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 25% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 9474F uses around 29% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 11 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9474F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.1 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 40 (Threads: 80) | 48 (Threads: 96) | |
Cache | L1: 2,560KB, L2: 40.0MB, L3: 60MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 270W | 360W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $49.28 | $65.70 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 10 | |
CPU Value | 8.5 | 26.6 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2385(-25.3%) | 3192(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 62318(-40.7%) | 105010(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 2.30GHz | 62,318 | |
AMD EPYC 9474F | 105,010 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 2.30GHz | 8.5 | |
AMD EPYC 9474F | 26.6 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 2.30GHz | 2,385 | |
AMD EPYC 9474F | 3,192 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380 @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 9474F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 270W | 360W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |