Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9275F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz also around 43% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 26% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9275F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$2564.67 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 4.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 80KB, L2: 1.3MB, L3: 36MB | L1: 1,920KB, L2: 24.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 185W | 320W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $33.76 | $58.40 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q1 2025 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 2 | |
CPU Value | 17.7 | 23.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2522(-25.5%) | 3387(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 45517(-42.9%) | 79778(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz | 45,517 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 79,778 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz | 17.7 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 23.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz | 2,522 | |
AMD EPYC 9275F | 3,387 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 6336Y @ 2.40GHz | AMD EPYC 9275F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 185W | 320W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |