Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7352, while AMD EPYC 7352 is around 13% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 33% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 30 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz | ×AMD EPYC 7352 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$689.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 80 (Threads: 80) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | NA2 | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | NA2 | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q3 2021 | |
# of Samples | 19 | 11 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 58.5 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1327(-33.0%) | 1979(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 34997(-13.3%) | 40370(0.0%) |
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz | 34,997 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 40,370 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz | NA | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 58.5 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz | 1,327 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 1,979 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
ARM Neoverse-N1 80 Core 3000 MHz | AMD EPYC 7352 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |