Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 is newer than MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) also around 9% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) is around 18% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 181 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | |
2: MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) | |
×Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | ×MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | NA2 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Mobile/Embedded | Mobile/Embedded | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | NA2 | NA2 | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 8) | 8 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | NA2 | NA2 | |
TDP | NA2 | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | NA | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2021 | Q3 2021 | |
# of Samples | 65 | 116 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1592(-18.2%) | 1948(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5296(0.0%) | 4839(-8.6%) |
Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 5,296 | |
MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) | 4,839 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | 1,592 | |
MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) | 1,948 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 | MediaTek Dimensity 900 (MT6877) | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | NA | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |