Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 9274F is newer than Intel Xeon Gold 5320 @ 2.20GHz also around 49% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 46% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 7 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Gold 5320 @ 2.20GHz | ×AMD EPYC 9274F | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1398.5 - BUY
![]() |
$2873.99 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP5 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 4.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.4 GHz | Up to 4.3 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 26 (Threads: 52) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 2,080KB, L2: 32.5MB, L3: 39MB | NA2 | |
TDP | 185W | NA2 | |
Yearly Running Cost | $33.76 | NA | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2021 | Q2 2023 | |
# of Samples | 1 | 6 | |
CPU Value | 26.9 | 25.7 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1826(-45.9%) | 3373(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 37558(-49.2%) | 73982(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320 @ 2.20GHz | 37,558 | |
AMD EPYC 9274F | 73,982 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320 @ 2.20GHz | 26.9 | |
AMD EPYC 9274F | 25.7 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320 @ 2.20GHz | 1,826 | |
AMD EPYC 9274F | 3,373 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Gold 5320 @ 2.20GHz | AMD EPYC 9274F | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 185W | NA |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |