Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7453, while AMD EPYC 7453 is around 22% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz uses around 11% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 14 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: AMD EPYC 7453 | |
2: Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz | |
×AMD EPYC 7453 | ×Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$1677.42 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA4189 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
Cache | L1: 3,584KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 128MB | L1: 1,280KB, L2: 20.0MB, L3: 24MB | |
TDP | 225W | 250W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $41.06 | $45.63 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2021 | Q2 2022 | |
# of Samples | 5 | 9 | |
CPU Value | 30.2 | 30.2 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2522(-5.7%) | 2673(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 50575(0.0%) | 39293(-22.3%) |
AMD EPYC 7453 | 50,575 | |
Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz | 39,293 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7453 | 30.2 | |
Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz | 30.2 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7453 | 2,522 | |
Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz | 2,673 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7453 | Intel Xeon W-3335 @ 3.40GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 225W | 250W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.45 | 0.50 |
Running cost per day | $0.113 | $0.125 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 164.3 | 182.5 |
Running cost per year | $41.06 | $45.63 |