Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7443, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, AMD EPYC 7443 is around 10% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz uses around 30% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 20 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×AMD EPYC 7443 | ×Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA4189 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 38 (Threads: 76) | |
Cache | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | L1: 3,040KB, L2: 47.5MB, L3: 114MB | |
TDP | 200W | 270W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $36.50 | $49.28 | |
Other | Can support dual sockets | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2022 | Q2 2022 | |
# of Samples | 13 | 7 | |
CPU Value | 25.4 | 13.1 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2923(0.0%) | 2636(-9.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 56686(-4.1%) | 59091(0.0%) |
AMD EPYC 7443 | 56,686 | |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | 59,091 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | 25.4 | |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | 13.1 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | 2,923 | |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | 2,636 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
AMD EPYC 7443 | Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 200W | 270W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |