Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron G6900 is newer than AMD FX-6350 Six-Core, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Celeron G6900 is around 42% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Celeron G6900 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 1745 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Celeron G6900 | ×AMD FX-6350 Six-Core | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA1700,BGA1700 | AM3+ | |
CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
Clockspeed | 3.4 GHz | 3.9 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 4.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 6 (in 3 physical modules) | |
Cache | L1: 160KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 4MB | L1: 480KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
TDP | 46W | 125W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $8.40 | $22.81 | |
Other | Intel UHD Graphics 710 | ||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2022 | Q2 2013 | |
# of Samples | 72 | 1673 | |
CPU Value | 0.0 | 60.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2702(0.0%) | 1575(-41.7%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 4507(-2.4%) | 4618(0.0%) |
Intel Celeron G6900 | 4,507 | |
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core | 4,618 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G6900 | NA | |
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core | 60.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G6900 | 2,702 | |
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core | 1,575 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Celeron G6900 | AMD FX-6350 Six-Core | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 46W | 125W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |