Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7543, while the multi-threaded (CPU Mark) is simliar, Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz is around 9% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz uses around 12% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 18 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
1: Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | |
2: AMD EPYC 7543 | |
×Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7543 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.0 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 38 (Threads: 76) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 3,040KB, L2: 47.5MB, L3: 114MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
TDP | 270W | 240W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $49.28 | $43.80 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2022 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 11 | |
CPU Value | 13.1 | 16.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2636(0.0%) | 2398(-9.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 59091(-4.4%) | 61788(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | 59,091 | |
AMD EPYC 7543 | 61,788 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | 13.1 | |
AMD EPYC 7543 | 16.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | 2,636 | |
AMD EPYC 7543 | 2,398 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3375 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 7543 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 270W | 240W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | 0.54 | 0.48 |
Running cost per day | $0.135 | $0.120 |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | 197.1 | 175.2 |
Running cost per year | $49.28 | $43.80 |